SD-09 manufacturer’s field reports must be identified in the submittal how?

• A. Prominently indicate each report and the spec and paragraph to which it pertains
• B. Only listed in a separate table
• C. Included without designation
• D. Only summarized in the cover letter

Answer: (A)

The main idea is to ensure traceability by tying every manufacturer’s field report directly to the exact contract requirement it addresses. By prominently indicating each SD-09 field report and referencing the specific specification and paragraph it pertains to, reviewers can quickly verify that the report fulfills the precise contract clause, date, and scope. This clear mapping supports efficient QA/QC reviews, accurate approval decisions, and a reliable project record, reducing ambiguity and back-and-forth.

If a submittal only lists reports in a separate table, or includes them without linking to the relevant spec/paragraph, or merely summarizes them in the cover letter, the connection between the field data and the contractual requirement becomes unclear. The identification practice described ensures that each report is immediately auditable against the contract, which is essential for compliance and project documentation.